system command
Fairlight
fairlite at fairlite.com
Tue Nov 1 16:47:00 PST 2005
Confusious (Kenneth Brody) say:
> Quoting Fairlight (Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:32:53 -0500):
>
> > ONLY to help -Ken- not have to waste more time.
> [...]
> > <QUOTE POSTER="DM" FORMAT="BROKEN_MAILER_LINEBREAKS">
> > Hello Everyone!
> >
> > I am on IBM AIX. I have 4.8 filepro soon to upgraded to 5.0.
> >
> > I would like to place the following string in a system command:
> >
> > echo "\033&oFvar searchnum=55555;CompileFile(\"260268.cs\");\015"
> >
> > When this line is executed on the command line it works perfectly.
>
> Okay. That generates this sequence:
>
> ^[&oFvar searchnum=55555;CompileFile("260268.cs");^M
>
> (Where "^[" is ESCape and "^M" is Ctrl-M.)
>
> According to Dennis, the filePro code generates this:
>
> ^[&oFvar searchnum=55555;CompileFile(\"260268.cs\");
>
> The only difference is the filePro code generates extraneous backslashes,
> and the missing Ctrl-M. I am going to assume that the Ctrl-M is there
> but not shown in his sample.
Right. Look at what he said he wanted, which was (\"260268.cs\"). That's
what he -said- he wanted. His code actually generated (originally, when I
tested it) (\260268.cs\). My mods gave him what he -said- he wanted. If
it wasn't elucidated clearly, Not My Problem. It even had the backing of
his own code, in which he had fP code of (\\\""260268.cs\\\") which implies
that he -wanted- those extraneous backslashes.
What can I say? I gave a line that generated exactly what was requested.
mark->
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list