rjfill0 question

Jeff Harrison jeffaharrison at yahoo.com
Fri May 13 09:36:37 PDT 2005


--- Rod Caddy <rcaddy at pro-set.com> wrote:
> I have a SCO Unix system running Filepro 4.8.09D4. 
> I have a 12 digit 
> field(field #1) with an edit called jobno that fills
> in - for the number.
> 
> jobno  \~( N N N N | A A)<"-">N N N N N<"-">N |
> jobno1 
> 
> jobno1 \~(<0>N N N | A A)<"-">N N N N N<"-">N |
> jobno2 
> 
> jobno2 \~(<0><0> N N | A A)<"-">N N N N N<"-">N
> 
> Sample job number: 0035-00141-5
> 
> I have another field(field #176) that is 3 digits
> with the edit rjfill0.
> 
> RJFILL0 \0\{N}
> 
> Sample number: 001
> 
> I have a third field(field #177) that is (15,*) and
> I take and join the 
> fields together with the following syntax: 1&176. 
> The resulting number, 
> in my mind should be something like:
> 0035-00141-5001.  When I view 1 on 
> the screen it is correct as above.  When I view 176
> on the screen it is 
> correct as above.  When I view 177 on the screen it
> appears like this:
> 
> 0035-00141-51
> 
> At the risk of being agreed with, Am I crazy?
> 
> -- 
> 

Well, I can't duplicate this problem.  It works fine
for me.  When are you doing the processing - Is it
automatic, @wlf, etc ?

If it is done @w* then you would need a display
command in order to see the result, but somehow I
suspect that you know that already.  Is it possible
that you have some automatic processing running that
is over-writing the result?

Jeff Harrison
jeffaharrison at yahoo.com

Author of JHExport and JHImport.  The easiest and
fastest way to generate code for filePro exports and
imports.

 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


More information about the Filepro-list mailing list