rjfill0 question
Jeff Harrison
jeffaharrison at yahoo.com
Fri May 13 09:36:37 PDT 2005
--- Rod Caddy <rcaddy at pro-set.com> wrote:
> I have a SCO Unix system running Filepro 4.8.09D4.
> I have a 12 digit
> field(field #1) with an edit called jobno that fills
> in - for the number.
>
> jobno \~( N N N N | A A)<"-">N N N N N<"-">N |
> jobno1
>
> jobno1 \~(<0>N N N | A A)<"-">N N N N N<"-">N |
> jobno2
>
> jobno2 \~(<0><0> N N | A A)<"-">N N N N N<"-">N
>
> Sample job number: 0035-00141-5
>
> I have another field(field #176) that is 3 digits
> with the edit rjfill0.
>
> RJFILL0 \0\{N}
>
> Sample number: 001
>
> I have a third field(field #177) that is (15,*) and
> I take and join the
> fields together with the following syntax: 1&176.
> The resulting number,
> in my mind should be something like:
> 0035-00141-5001. When I view 1 on
> the screen it is correct as above. When I view 176
> on the screen it is
> correct as above. When I view 177 on the screen it
> appears like this:
>
> 0035-00141-51
>
> At the risk of being agreed with, Am I crazy?
>
> --
>
Well, I can't duplicate this problem. It works fine
for me. When are you doing the processing - Is it
automatic, @wlf, etc ?
If it is done @w* then you would need a display
command in order to see the result, but somehow I
suspect that you know that already. Is it possible
that you have some automatic processing running that
is over-writing the result?
Jeff Harrison
jeffaharrison at yahoo.com
Author of JHExport and JHImport. The easiest and
fastest way to generate code for filePro exports and
imports.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list