OT: Question re: SCO Use

[Brian K. White]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra at baylink.com>
To: "FilePro Mailing List" <filepro-list at lists.celestial.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Question re: SCO Use


> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:28:53PM -0400, Jean-Pierre A. Radley wrote:
>> But after tomorrow when OSR 6.0.0 is officially launched, I revert to
>> being nought but a consumer of documentation.
>
> Oh: you mean System 5 Release 3.2v6.0?
>
> When *are* they going to finally move up to Release 4?
>
> Oh, "never"?

Oh, "now"?

It's unixware's kernel with userspace and kernel api's added so it's a 
drop-in for open server.
unixwares kernel and core userspace performs similar to or better than the 
best linux & freebsd versions and has the features missing from open server 
and has proven production quality implimentations of features that linux/bsd 
either don't have or don't have a good working version yet.

It's fun to make jokes and all, but there are still those annoying facts , 
like, how many years has sco's journalling filesystem been not only in 
existence, but solid production quality? And linux/bsd? hmmm... Darn those 
bothersome facts...

Brian K. White  --  brian at aljex.com  --  http://www.aljex.com/bkw/
+++++[>+++[>+++++>+++++++<<-]<-]>>+.>.+++++.+++++++.-.[>+<---]>++.
filePro BBx  Linux SCO  Prosper/FACTS AutoCAD  #callahans Satriani