Question about checks for min and max values

[Fairlight]

With neither thought nor caution, Jay Ashworth blurted:
> 
> Well, here I waver, Mark.  C supplies == as the equals operator because
> = as the assignment op is *in context* in many of the same places, and
> disambiguation is necessary; I believe other languages that reassigned
> "equal to" to a different token did it for the same reason.

Yes, but they can both appear in the same place, but have differing
functionalities.  C's role reversal may seem confusing at first, but at
least there's a -reason- to have two different operators at the same
contextual level.  They fulfill different roles.  The same can't be said of
"=" and "eq" in filePro on a conditional.  At least what they did made
sense.

mark->