Question for Tommorow's QnA with KB

[Kenneth Brody]

Fairlight wrote:
[...]
> However...to the OP:  I think this may be along the lines of the kind of
> thing John is hoping to -avoid- for the discussion on Tuesday.  I mean, he
> can correct me if I'm wrong, but even taken from a constructive point of
> view (which I think we both share here), it's a focus on fP development and
> what is lacking (or perceived as lacking) than it is a question on doing
> things with the current implementation.  And John's comments seemed to
> indicate -that- was the purpose of the event...to focus on how to do things
> with the current implementation.  I plan on avoiding my own beheading by
> refraining from such discussion on Tuesday.  :)
[...]

The plan is for me to be there (along with Laura) as a filePro "expert",
and not a representative of fPTech.  Questions along the lines of "how do
I get filePro to do this", and discussions of what people have been doing
with filePro, and "I've never understood associated fields, can you give
me a brief explanation" are what we're aiming for.  Questions along the
lines of "how can I get fPTech to add this in the next release" would most
likely be answered with "contact them and submit a wishlist item".  I will
not answer any questions related to management and business decisions made
by TPTB at fPTech.

-- 
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
| Kenneth J. Brody        | www.hvcomputer.com |                             |
| kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com     | #include <std_disclaimer.h> |
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
Don't e-mail me at: <mailto:ThisIsASpamTrap at gmail.com>