BUG? dmoedef asks for Alignment Form Y/N even on non-forms
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at baylink.com
Mon Jan 3 15:24:29 PST 2005
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:40:29PM -0500, Nancy Palmquist wrote:
> Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > This one was spotted by the boss, on site, so I'm not 100% sure of the
> > details, but something to try:
> >
> > SCO 4.8 on SCO 5.0.x.
> >
> > If your report format is a standard report, filePro can't print an
> > alignment form for it, which is reasonably sensible.
> >
> > But dmoedef *asks if you want one*. At least dreport correctly fails
> > to prompt you. Should not dmoedef *fail* to ask, in situations where
> > one cannot be printed anyway?
>
> I would say that it should ask. In the case where the output is
> directed to a device, it is a resonable option even on Unix. How would
> dmoedef know how you intend to direct the output?
I believe you've missed my point.
> It is somewhat useless when the output is spooled but is you put it in a
> report and the user understands that it will create a few trash pages
> that will give them time to align the printer, it can still be useful.
Yep.
The issue is not "-P device" versus spooled output.
The issue is "Report type: Form" vs. "Report type: report". If the
latter is true, then dreport *will not print the alignment pattern*.
Since dreport won't print it, and dmoedef *knows* that it's not a form,
then dmoedef should not be prompting for it; it's confusing. "I know I
set it; there it is: why isn't it *printing*?"
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra at baylink.com
Designer Baylink RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274
If you can read this... thank a system adminstrator. Or two. --me
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list