lightmail from fairlight

[John Esak]

I'm responding to the long list of notes in this thread... but not quoting
any because they are all off the mrak.  Bill's comments moved me to say I
felt differently...  His motives were to defend Mark... albeit slighting
Nancy some little bit... it was very clear to me by what she wrote ...
_exactly_ what she meant... and I also "got" the joke and humor in her last
line.  Bill, didn't, no big deal... the real problem with the whole thread
is that none of us hit the _real_ point of contention... As nice as Dennis's
note was regarding lightMail., it was WAY off the central product by stating
over and over again that it is somehow filePro dependant.  It isn't.
LightMail has zero need for filePro (and vice  versa as JP pointed out,
too).

The real thing is that LM is a good product for sending out mail attachments
directly from filePro or from any product... or from the command line....
We all neglected to comment on this, which is the much more important issue.
:-)

Next topic?? please???  :-)

John