OT: SLR 5 Tape drive vs DAT
Bill Vermillion
fp at wjv.com
Wed Feb 2 11:04:50 PST 2005
Shakespeare wrote plays and sonnets that will last an eternity,
but on Wed, Feb 02 11:13 , Lerebours, Jose wrote:"
> Walter aired:
> >
> > Fairlight wrote:
> > > DVD-RW/+RW anyone?
> >
> > Cons:
> > They only allow up to 100,000 rewrite cycles[1]
> > Pros:
> > Disks are about $1.50 each now.
> > Writers are less than $100 now.
> >
> > Yep, I wanna be in the tape business today. Oh, wait we beat
> > that up a
> > few weeks ago...
> >
>
> Never mind CDs/DVDs ... use Flash media!
> Funny how we, the filePro community, appear to be
> inclined to suggest the use of technology that is
> more common in the windows arena than it is in
> *NIX.
>
> I am sure that LINUX has tools to use CDs and DVDs
> but I am not sure they are as advanced as those
> available for windows.
I find that BackupEdge and LoneTar for Linux systems are more
advanced than the backup systems I saw clients using on Windows
systems. But I've only seen a couple of those in use and they
were gawd-awful slow compared to BackupEdge.
> I can almost bet the farm
> that SCO UNIX has nothing available worth talking
> about - specially if money (cost) is an issue.
Good Windows backup SW costs about the same as and Unix commercial
product - often much more.
And a good solution for a windows shop may be a SAN type server and
then back that up to the media that fits the best size factor.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list