OT: Flagging OT (was: Re: fax to eM41L)

[Fairlight]

This public service announcement was brought to you by Dennis Malen:
> As far as Jean-Pierre's suggestion that the subject should possess "OT:", I 
> have no idea what you are trying to say. Please expand upon what you are 
> trying to say for me and others of us who have no idea.

He's saying that since it's not related to filePro -directly- (strictly
speaking, even if you're hooking it in, maybe it wasn't clearly stated
enough--I can't remember anymore), then it's off-topic.  

Correct nettiquette dictates that if something is off-topic, you flag it OT
(for Off Topic) so those who wish to skip it may more easily do so.

Frankly, I think anything labelled "fax to email" is clearly OT anyway, he
knew it was OT or he wouldn't have said anything, and he just likes to
complain.  

But in practise, it's an accepted and polite standard we should be
following in flagging things that are OT when we actually realise they are.

mark->