neural networks and filePro
GCC Consulting
gcc at optonline.net
Tue Nov 16 18:15:17 PST 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: filepro-list-bounces at lists.celestial.com
> [mailto:filepro-list-bounces at lists.celestial.com] On Behalf
> Of Bill Vermillion
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 6:46 PM
> To: filePro List
> Subject: Re: neural networks and filePro
>
> On Tue, Nov 16 14:52 , Walter Vaughan moved his mouse,
> rebooted for the change to take effect, and then said:"
>
> > John Esak wrote:
>
> > >>Has anyone fed their filePro derived order - line item data at a
> > >>neural network to see any associations?
>
> > >Do you mean _other_ than my own neural net?
>
> > No. I'm really serious.
>
> > Do customers order in patterns? Does the purchase of one
> item indicate
> > the purchase of something later?
>
> I'm imressed with the matching which is done by Amazon on
> recommnedations - and my tastes are so widely scattered.
>
> It inspired me to check what the recommendations are at this
> moment and I see Koyaanisqatsi / Powaqqatsi in the recommend list.
> I own those and it also listed Kurosawa's Dreams - which I also own
> - and those aren't what you'd call mainstream - so they
> definitely are doing something right.
>
> What I like about Amazon is they have a 'why was I
> recommended this' - and one of the reasons was Kieslowski's
> Three Colors trilogy.
>
> About a year or so ago Sears was expanding their data base of
> customer purchases to be able to analyze purchases by a
> customer and make recommendations. One example was if
> something was bought in kids swimming suits, and luggage
> bought by adults, they might conclude a trip was in the
> offing and make offers for those.
>
> They expected their database to go from 7 Terabytes to over
> 70 terabytes for that analysis ability.
>
> Trends and tastes based on past purchases are proving to be
> valid for at least some places.
>
> ...
>
> > Has anyone applied data they generated with filePro to a neural
> > network to learn behavior?
>
> But don't you have to analyze and give some criteria to each
> thing bought to be able to make predictions? To me that
> would be the hardest part - doing the analysis of data - and
> not the storing/collecting.
Super markets and other brick & Mortar retailers are doing this with their
affinity programs.
However, there is a problem with all of this.
Case 1: Amazon
I purchased THE Atkins Book for my mother in law. I am 6.1 and weigh 175
pounds. I kept receiving e-mail, snail mail and phone calls about diets.
Case 2: Foodtown Supermarket
Our vet suggested that we put our older cat on a carb diet. So we tried various
infants pasta based foods. The cat eat these foods for about a week. However,
we kept getting offers each time we checked out for children's food. This
happened for almost a year and 1/2. No matter what I did at the store level, I
couldn't stop these 'suggestions" for children's food.
Finally in desperation, I sent a letter the CEO of Foodtown. I told him what
was happening and then said that he may be loosing business because of this.
First of all it may have been grandparents purchasing the item when a grandchild
stayed with them. Once the kid left, they didn't need the food.
I think the next reason may have gotten to them; I said, you may be loosing a
mother whose child past away and this constant reminder of her lose would cause
her to stop shopping in his store.
The last suggestion I made was to a date check to see if the person has stopped
purchasing this category of merchandise for some fixed interval.
Within 2 weeks of my letter, the toddler food items stopped coming up.
Data mining can be beneficial, but it has to have some "smarts" to read changes.
Richard Kreiss
GCC Consulting
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list