linux- filepro -putty
Enrique Arredondo
henry at vegena.net
Tue Mar 16 15:51:55 PST 2004
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian K. White" <brian at aljex.com>
To: <filepro-list at seaslug.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: linux- filepro -putty
> Enrique Arredondo wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Vermillion" <fp at wjv.com>
> > To: <filepro-list at seaslug.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:16 AM
> > Subject: Re: linux- filepro -putty
> >
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:53:13AM -0800, Enrique Arredondo thus
> >> spoke:
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra at baylink.com>
> >>> To: <filepro-list at seaslug.org>
> >>> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 5:54 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: linux- filepro -putty
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:34:21PM -0500, Fairlight wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Confusious (Enrique Arredondo) say:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> for Red Hat linux running filepro 5.0.13 which is the
> >>>>>> best terminal emulation over ssh that would support
> >>>>>> instering lines and deleting lines when doing developing.
> >>
> >>>>> I use PFTERM=xterm with PuTTY.
> >>
> >>>> Which works ok, as long as you have a sufficiently recent
> >>>> version of the filePro termcap file. Since fpTech Release
> >>>> Engineering (<roar)) doesn't bother to put release numbers
> >>>> in these things, I can't tell you exactly which one it is I
> >>>> use, but I'm pretty sure all the 5.0's will let you do that
> >>>> unmodified. It *might* need to be from a Linux version of
> >>>> filePro -- ISTR that I could do it with 4.8/Linux, but *not*
> >>>> with 4.8/SCO.
> >>
> >>> Could you please decipher the following ,which code means
> >>> insert a line :
> >>
> >> Termcaps aren't that hard to decipher. Note the F1-F4 below,
> >> where the F1 inserts char and F3 inserts line.
> >>
> >> The L0 thru Lx are the labels used. Notice that L0-L3 are labeled
> >> F1-F4. The L's match the P's. So if F3 inserts a line it shows
> >> L2=F3. The L's and P's correspond so the key defined so
> >> when the system sees \EOR it is associated with P2.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> xterm|xterm-color|rxvt|XFree86 3.3.x xterm or rxvt 2.x:\
> >>>
> >>> :am:cd=\E[J:ce=\E[K:cl=\E[2J\EH:co#80:dc=\E[P:dl=\E[M:dn=\E[B:\
> >>>
> >> ho=\E[H:ic=\E[@:li#25:kh=\E[H:ku=\E[A:kd=\E[B:kl=\E[D:kr=\E[C:eo:\
> >>> :GS=\E(0:GE=\E(B:\
> >>> :GV=x:GH=q:G1=k:G2=l:G3=m:G4=j:GZ=:\
> >>> :GU=v:GD=w:GC=n:GR=t:GL=u:RT=^J:\
> >>> :tc=linux:\
> >>> :L0=F1:L1=F2:L2=F3:L3=F4:L4=ESC ESC:L5=F5:\
> >>> :L6=Pg Up:L7=Pg Dn:L8=ESC TAB:L9=TAB:LA=Ctrl-O:\
> >>> :LB=F6:LC=Ctrl-L:LD=F7:\
> >>> :LE=F8:LG=Ctrl-X:LH=F9:LY=Ctrl-C:LZ=Enter:\
> >>> :P0=\EOP:P1=\EOQ:P2=\EOR:P3=\EOS:P4=\E\E:P5=\E[15~:\
> >>> :P6=\E[5~:P7=\E[6~:P8=\E^I:P9=^I:\
> >>> :PA=^O:PB=\E[17~:PC=^L:PD=\E[18~:PE=\E[19~:PG=^X:PH=\E[20~:\
> >>> :PJ=\E[21~:LJ=F10:
> >>>
> >
> >
> > Ahhh so if I see that when I hit the F1-F4 keys on putty it display
> > 1~ 2~ 3~ 4~ , so then I go to the termcap and change that EOS EOR,
> > etc... for 1~ 2~ 3~ 4~ and it will work ?
>
> That just means putty is not in truth emulating an xterm accurately enough
> to match the fp termcaps definition of "xterm" which, according to the
label
> claims to be tuned for the xterm that comes as part of XFree86
> The label is a little bogus right off the bat though, because it also
claims
> to be tuned for rxvt, and the two are not equal so it can only be really
> correct for one or the other, not both.
>
> I posted what I think are better-working xterm and rxvt definitions a few
> days ago.
> Try them.
>
> By default putty sets it's TERM to "xterm"
> but on another screen in the putty settings it has a set of options
> specifically for the F-keys, and by default, the setting is not "xterm".
> It's set so that F1 sends \E[1~ , which is not the standard for any xterm
I
> know of. But there is a simple check box for "xterm" which causes F1 to
send
> Xfree's version of xterm F1 key. Try simply changing that setting in
putty.
>
> http://www.aljex.com/bkw/tmp/putty_keyboard.gif
>
>
>
BINGO!!
that was it!
Thanks!
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list