wish list

[John Esak]

I sent almost this _exact_ email to Howie and the FP Tech team when the
wishlist first came out. The current scheme gives virtually NO value to the
wish at all... no granularity of importance.  It it being good, great, must
have, etc., doesn't help much.  I think the numbers should be 1 through 10,
then 1-3 could be low, 4-6 medium, 7-9 high and 10 must have.  I personally
have never voted NO-WAY or 0 for anyone's wish... who am I to vote that way
on someone else's idea unless it is a duplicate. The wishlist as it is now,
forces me to say good for a whole bunch of wishes that I would really want
to say 7 8 or 9 for.  They are NOT all equal in my mind.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: filepro-list-bounces at lists.celestial.com
> [mailto:filepro-list-bounces at lists.celestial.com]On Behalf Of Brian K.
> White
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 1:21 PM
> To: filePro mailing list
> Subject: wish list
>
>
> I wish the wish-list allowed you to browse all the wishes on-file
>
> And add a "me too" check box or a 1-10 rating field so that wishes
> popularity/urgency could be calculated by adding up the checkboxes or the
> ratings.
>
> Using ratings instead of checkboxes would allow for example, everyone to
> indicate they would like an unimportant feature and an important
> one and the
> two features wouldn't look equally important.
>
> And if the wish-list had a "wish-list" category I could have
> submitted this
> stuff there instead of here.
>
> Brian K. White  --  brian at aljex.com  --  http://www.aljex.com/bkw/
> +++++[>+++[>+++++>+++++++<<-]<-]>>+.>.+++++.+++++++.-.[>+<---]>++.
> filePro BBx  Linux SCO  Prosper/FACTS AutoCAD  #callahans Satriani
>
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list