Why?

[Fairlight]

Simon--er, no...it was George Simon--said:
> Excellent point, Jay.
> The way I see it, 5.0.09 is very solid, at least as far as my application is
> concerned.

Apparently _NOT_!  You've been complaining for like three days now (if it's
shorter, it sure seems like longer) about something that apparently
demonstrates that 5.0.9 -isn't- very solid.  There's a possibility
(probably fairly high) that something is fixed between those four releases,
and you refuse to even try it.  Okay, your choice, fine.

But then, if you're not willing to even -verify- whether that's it, why
should anyone go to any great lengths to help you?

Now it's either that 5.0.9 is solid, or it's not.  We don't know until you
get off your posterior and actually test with it.  But I don't see how you
can say it's so darned solid when you're claiming it crashes on you.  Make
up your mind, do.

> I don't want to upgrade to a newer version (unless it is going to provide
> some feature a really want, like memo printing) an risk the chance of
> something that is working fine now, breaking.

It might provide an executable that doesn't crash on your code.  If that's
not a desired feature, I don't know what is.

mark->
-- 
Bring the web-enabling power of OneGate to -your- filePro applications today!

Try the live filePro-based, OneGate-enabled demo at the following URL:
               http://www2.onnik.com/~fairlite/flfssindex.html