Quoting (was Re: Why?)

[George Simon]

And it doesn't come like that out of the box?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kenneth Brody" <kenbrody at bestweb.net>
To: "George Simon" <flowersoft at compuserve.com>
Cc: "filePro mailing list" <filepro-list at seaslug.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:37 PM
Subject: Quoting (was Re: Why?)


> 
> Quoting George Simon <flowersoft at compuserve.com>:
> 
> > I'm using Outlook.  What's wrong with the way it quotes?
> [...]
> 
> You're kidding, right?
> 
> Let's take a look at the section of unquoted material of yours from
> Jay's message, which (properly) quoted yours:
> 
> > Does it crash on the first output record?
> > No, it only crashes when the first record meeting the criteria for the
> > called table is executed.
> 
> The first line is from my message, the next two are from your reply.
> If I hadn't been the one to write the first line, and known that I
> hadn't written the next two, there is absolutely no way to know who
> wrote what.
> 
> Note how your message text is properly quoted above, having been
> marked with "> " to designate quoted text.
> 
> Had your message properly quoted mine, then Jay's quoting of your
> message would have looked like this:
> 
> > > Does it crash on the first output record?
> > No, it only crashes when the first record meeting the criteria for the
> > called table is executed.
> 
> Notice the difference?
> 
> Somewhere in Outlook is a way to tell it to follow universally accepted
> quoting methods.
> 
> --
> KenBrody at BestWeb dot net        spamtrap: <g8ymh8uf001 at sneakemail.com>
> http://www.hvcomputer.com
> http://www.5starEbooks.com
> http://www.fileProPlus.com
>