Why?

[Kenneth Brody]

George Simon wrote:
> 
> I posted the entire called table.
> 
> I ran a report using an automatic table consisting of only 23 lines.  All of
> these lines were dummy field definitions needed to run the report.  No other
> processing done from automatic except to call the "getlong" table.
> When I run the report this way, I do not get the error.

Which is exactly what we expected.

> So it must be something in the other 1,226 lines of code that breaks it,

Which is why, without you either narrowing it down, or sending the entire
file (with enough other files to be able to actually run it), it's not
going to be duplicated.

> but
> only when the table (getlong) is called from automatic processing.  If I
> call the table (getlong) from the output processing table (compare) using
> the normal automatic table, the error does not occur.

You've mentioned this over and over, and I'm not sure what you're trying
to get at.  ("If I rearrange my processing, it doesn't crash anymore" is
even more evidence that you need to send the processing as-is to fPTech
in order for them to be able to duplicate and fix it.)

-- 
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
| Kenneth J. Brody        | www.hvcomputer.com |                             |
| kenbrody at spamcop.net | www.fptech.com     | #include <std_disclaimer.h> |
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+