fpsupport (was Re: segmentation violation in fp)

[Jay R. Ashworth]

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 03:44:48PM -0400, Kenneth Brody wrote:
> My understanding is that the old address got on so many spammer lists,
> that it wasn't usable anymore.  (Unless you wanted to read every message,
> lest you miss one that was really a request for support.)  As you noticed,
> the reject message tells you the new address to use.  (Spammers never see
> their reject messages, but humans sending real support requests will.)

Well, at the risk of sounding self important, why in hell didn'tyou
change it to support@, like every other tech company on the planet
uses?  :-)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra at baylink.com
Designer                          Baylink                             RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates        The Things I Think                        '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274

	"You know: I'm a fan of photosynthesis as much as the next guy,
	but if God merely wanted us to smell the flowers, he wouldn't 
	have invented a 3GHz microprocessor and a 3D graphics board."
					-- Luke Girardi