@ub and @cb issues - an idea
GCC Consulting
gcc at optonline.net
Wed Apr 21 15:14:06 PDT 2004
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:09:32PM -0400, GCC Consulting wrote:
> I wrote a physician's credentialing system which required much more
> tracking of who did what & when then even the *nix system maintained
> fields offered. It took a separate file(s) to track the information
> management wanted as to who did what & when. This included who looked
> or printed information(when by date & time) and 10 levels of
> modification tracking (complete "secret" copies of before(when "<U>
> was pressed & after snapshots of the data). Too much information to
> just track the change. It took 12 screens to get all of the data.
Ah, yes; auditing.
I've often wished for a *clean* way to get "what this field had in it before I
changed it" in WLF processing -- one, that is, that didn't require either a WEF*
with a temp dummy that couldn't have the proper edit, or a separate routine for
each field -- @PV would be nice. :-)
> The above system had it's own login file controlling access to the
> system. One set of files was available to anyone. The other file had
> permission controls applied even before any data could be seen.
> This file required a second login to insure that someone other then
> the person logged in to the computer wasn't trying to access the
> restricted file.
I'm curious; assuming this was on Unix, why wasn't checking @ID good enough for
the security you needed?
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jay,
Don't assume anything. This was Win NT and not *nix. Version was 4.8 not 5.
Win98 clients.
This company spent over $150,000 to rewrite the application in using Sybase.
They paid me to create various ASCII output files to be imported by their new
app. This went on for almost a year. I would get a call, create the processing
and e-mail it to them.
They paid their bills on time. I was glad to loose them as an account as they
kept firing & hiring people. New staff almost every time I went there before I
was advised my services were no longer needed.
Richard Kreiss
GCC Consulting
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list